Property Management Software
Barefoot
Enterprise-grade vacation rental PMS built for customization and scale
Best for Scale
Enterprise PMS that rewards operators who outgrow simpler tools
From $800 • Free trial
Comparison
Barefoot vs iGMS
Pricing, pros and cons, and buyer-fit side-by-side. Pick the one that matches your operation — or see why neither should.
Property Management Software
iGMS
Automate 90% of your vacation rental hosting tasks
Best for Small Hosts
Solid automation for small portfolios, but outgrown quickly by reporting needs
From $14/listing • No free trial
✓Editorial verdict
Which Should You Pick: Barefoot or iGMS?
Pick Barefoot if you operate a professional management company with 20+ units and need trust accounting, owner statements, and deep workflow customization backed by an open API and 60+ integration partners. Pick iGMS if you manage fewer than 20 listings across Airbnb/Vrbo/Booking.com and need affordable automation starting at $14/listing/mo without an enterprise sales process.
Editorial perspective from the Barefoot side; factual claims about iGMS are drawn from its review.
Pricing Side-by-Side
Barefoot
Full pricing →From $800 • Free trial
1–50 units
$800/mo
50 listings
Booking fee: 1% of rent on Airbnb/VRBO bookings
- Full trust accounting
- Owner statements
- Reservation and booking management
- Customizable workflows, fees, and reporting
- Direct integrations to Airbnb, VRBO, TripAdvisor
- Open API access
51–100 units
$1,100/mo
100 listings
Booking fee: 1% of rent on Airbnb/VRBO bookings
- Everything in 1–50 tier
iGMS
Full pricing →From $14/listing • No free trial
Lite
$14/property/mo
No stated limit
Booking fee: None stated
- Multi-channel calendar sync
- Automated guest messaging
- Cleaning management
- Direct booking tools
Flex
$1/booked night ($20/property minimum)
No stated limit
Booking fee: None stated
- Everything in Lite
- Pay-per-use pricing model
Pro
$18/property/mo
No stated limit
Booking fee: None stated
- Everything in Lite
- Advanced features
Enterprise
Custom
30+ properties
Booking fee: None stated
- Everything in Pro
- Custom pricing
What each tool does well — and where it falls short
What Barefoot does well
Highly configurable platform instead of preset workflows
Teams can customize processes, fees, communication, and reporting to match their operations rather than adapting to rigid defaults. Reviewers on Capterra consistently cite configurability as the top differentiator.
Exceptional customer support with 95% retention rate
Users report submitting questions by end of day and receiving solutions the next morning. The 95% customer retention rate backs up the support quality claims.
Rock-solid system stability after 20+ years
Multiple reviewers note the software has no bugs or glitches. Two decades of development have produced a mature, reliable codebase.
What iGMS does well
Strong automation that drives real portfolio growth
Users report iGMS helped them grow by over 50% and add new units with less effort. The platform automates guest messaging, reviews, and cleaning management.
Zero commission on direct bookings
Direct bookings through iGMS eliminate OTA fees of up to 17%, allowing property managers to keep significantly more revenue compared to listing exclusively on platforms like Airbnb or Vrbo.
Proven scale across global operations
iGMS manages almost 90,000 property listings across 49+ countries and processes more than 500,000 reservations monthly, demonstrating reliable multi-channel sync at scale.
Where Barefoot falls short
Steep learning curve and dated interface
The UI is not modern and onboarding requires significant setup and training investment. Operators should plan for a real ramp-up period.
Airbnb integration is problematic
Some features available before Airbnb integration are lost after connecting, and setting rates through the integration is challenging. Operators heavy on Airbnb should test carefully.
High entry cost shuts out small operators
At $800/mo for up to 50 units, an operator with 10 listings pays effectively $80/unit/mo — far more than per-listing competitors charging $10–20/unit.
Where iGMS falls short
Financial reporting is a weak point
95% of reviews on financial reporting say the system offers limited report variations and customizations, making it difficult for operators who need detailed revenue analytics.
No accounting software integration
iGMS lacks built-in accounting features and has no QuickBooks integration, forcing property managers to maintain a completely separate accounting workflow.
Calendar sync reliability concerns
Some users report booking synchronization problems that can lead to double bookings across platforms, which is a serious operational risk for multi-channel hosts.
Which Should You Pick
Pick Barefoot if
Established vacation rental companies with 20+ units who need robust customization and don't mind the learning curve.
Skip Barefoot if
You have under 20 units — the $800/mo base cost makes per-unit economics unfavorable compared to per-listing alternatives.
Pick iGMS if
Small to medium property managers who want to automate 90% of daily hosting tasks across multiple OTAs like Airbnb, Booking.com, and Vrbo from one unified calendar.
Skip iGMS if
Large-scale operations requiring advanced financial reporting, QuickBooks integration, or enterprise-level team management tools.
Where Barefoot and iGMS actually differ
- Barefoot starts at $800/mo for 1–50 units with full trust accounting, owner statements, and 1099-ready reporting. iGMS starts at $14/listing/mo (Lite) or $18/listing/mo (Pro) but lacks trust accounting and financial reporting depth.
- Barefoot offers an open API and 60+ technology partners spanning pricing, smart home, and accounting integrations. iGMS has limited API access and concentrates on core OTA channel connections (Airbnb, Vrbo, Booking.com).
- iGMS processes 500K+ reservations monthly across 49+ countries with a mobile-friendly interface and strong Airbnb messaging automation. Barefoot's UI is desktop-first and dated, with its strongest channel story around Vrbo and direct bookings rather than Airbnb.
- Barefoot is built for enterprise-scale customization — configurable workflows, fee structures, and reporting — while iGMS is configured around standard OTA flows with less room to tailor operations.
- iGMS offers self-serve signup with a Flex plan ($1/booked night, $20/property minimum) for seasonal operators. Barefoot requires a sales process and onboarding investment with no pay-per-booking option.
Common objections
- iGMS costs a fraction of Barefoot — why would I pay $800+/mo when iGMS starts at $14/listing?
- Because iGMS doesn't do trust accounting, produce auditable owner statements, or support the configurable fee structures a licensed property management company needs. At 20+ units Barefoot's per-unit cost drops to $40 or less, and the accounting infrastructure it replaces (separate trust accounting software, manual owner reporting) often costs more than the price gap.
- iGMS has stronger Airbnb automation — does Barefoot's weak Airbnb integration matter?
- It matters if Airbnb is your dominant channel. Barefoot's Airbnb connection carries a 1% fee on rent collected and loses some features post-integration. If your portfolio leans Vrbo, direct bookings, or regional channels, Barefoot's broader integration ecosystem is the stronger play. Airbnb-heavy operators under 20 units are genuinely better served by iGMS.
- Can't I just start with iGMS and migrate to Barefoot later when I scale?
- Yes, and that's often the right sequence. iGMS works well up to roughly 20 listings before reporting and multi-user limitations start to hurt. The migration cost is real — Barefoot's onboarding is not trivial — but waiting until you actually need trust accounting and enterprise customization avoids paying for capabilities you aren't using yet.
Keep Digging
Barefoot
Enterprise PMS that rewards operators who outgrow simpler tools
iGMS
Solid automation for small portfolios, but outgrown quickly by reporting needs