Property Management
Tokeet
Affordable per-property vacation rental management with strong channel coverage
Best Value
Strong feature-to-price ratio for budget-conscious property managers
From $14.99/listing • 14-day trial
Comparison
Tokeet vs iGMS
Pricing, pros and cons, and buyer-fit side-by-side. Pick the one that matches your operation — or see why neither should.
Property Management
iGMS
Automate 90% of your vacation rental hosting tasks
Best for Small Hosts
Solid automation for small portfolios, but outgrown quickly by reporting needs
From $14/listing • No free trial
✓Editorial verdict
Which should you pick: Tokeet or iGMS?
Pick Tokeet if you need a full PMS with direct booking website builder (Webready), Rategenie dynamic pricing, and 8 direct OTA channels at $14.99/listing/mo. Pick iGMS if you run 2–20 listings, primarily Airbnb/Vrbo/Booking.com, and want pay-per-booked-night flexibility via the Flex plan ($1/booked night) — a pricing model that scales with actual bookings rather than listing count.
Editorial perspective from the Tokeet side; factual claims about iGMS are drawn from its review.
Pricing side-by-side
Tokeet
Full pricing →From $14.99/listing • 14-day trial
Per listing
$14.99 per property per month; 20% discount on annual billing. No booking fees or transaction fees.
iGMS
Full pricing →From $14/listing • No free trial
Lite
$14/property/mo
No stated limit
Booking fee: None stated
- Multi-channel calendar sync
- Automated guest messaging
- Cleaning management
- Direct booking tools
Flex
$1/booked night ($20/property minimum)
No stated limit
Booking fee: None stated
- Everything in Lite
- Pay-per-use pricing model
Pro
$18/property/mo
No stated limit
Booking fee: None stated
- Everything in Lite
- Advanced features
Enterprise
Custom
30+ properties
Booking fee: None stated
- Everything in Pro
- Custom pricing
What each tool does well — and where it falls short
What Tokeet does well
Competitive pricing with comprehensive features
84% of reviews mention pricing positively, appreciating flat per-property pricing with a wide range of functionalities and finding Tokeet more affordable than competitors.
Intuitive user interface and quick onboarding
The interface is sleek and easy to navigate, with new users able to get up to speed without extensive training.
Responsive customer support quality
Support agents provide speedy and professional responses that are kind and patient, helping users resolve issues efficiently despite the lack of phone support.
What iGMS does well
Strong automation that drives real portfolio growth
Users report iGMS helped them grow by over 50% and add new units with less effort. The platform automates guest messaging, reviews, and cleaning management.
Zero commission on direct bookings
Direct bookings through iGMS eliminate OTA fees of up to 17%, allowing property managers to keep significantly more revenue compared to listing exclusively on platforms like Airbnb or Vrbo.
Proven scale across global operations
iGMS manages almost 90,000 property listings across 49+ countries and processes more than 500,000 reservations monthly, demonstrating reliable multi-channel sync at scale.
Where Tokeet falls short
Steep configuration learning curve
There is an immense level of configuration necessary to get the best out of Tokeet, with many processes requiring more work than competing platforms to reach equivalent functionality.
Limited mobile app functionality
The mobile app is not user-friendly with limited functionality compared to the full desktop experience.
Account management concerns
Some users reported Tokeet unilaterally changing plans and cancelling subscriptions without consent, leaving them unable to manage OTA connections.
Where iGMS falls short
Financial reporting is a weak point
95% of reviews on financial reporting say the system offers limited report variations and customizations, making it difficult for operators who need detailed revenue analytics.
No accounting software integration
iGMS lacks built-in accounting features and has no QuickBooks integration, forcing property managers to maintain a completely separate accounting workflow.
Calendar sync reliability concerns
Some users report booking synchronization problems that can lead to double bookings across platforms, which is a serious operational risk for multi-channel hosts.
Which should you pick
Pick Tokeet if
Small to mid-sized property managers seeking affordable, feature-rich automation with strong channel management.
Skip Tokeet if
You require live phone support or advanced financial management for complex payment structures.
Pick iGMS if
Small to medium property managers who want to automate 90% of daily hosting tasks across multiple OTAs like Airbnb, Booking.com, and Vrbo from one unified calendar.
Skip iGMS if
Large-scale operations requiring advanced financial reporting, QuickBooks integration, or enterprise-level team management tools.
Where Tokeet and iGMS actually differ
- Tokeet: $14.99/listing/mo flat, always. iGMS: Lite at $14/property/mo, Flex at $1/booked night with a $20/property minimum, or Pro at $18/property/mo. Flex is unique — you pay for nights booked, not listings owned, which favors operators with seasonal or low-occupancy listings.
- Tokeet connects to 8 direct OTA channels (Airbnb, Vrbo, Booking.com, Expedia, Agoda, Marriott, Holidu, Rentals United). iGMS focuses on 3 core channels (Airbnb, Vrbo, Booking.com) — narrower but deep on the biggest three.
- Tokeet ships Webready (direct booking website builder) and Rategenie (dynamic pricing) as part of the base platform. iGMS supports direct booking management but doesn't document a dedicated website builder or a native dynamic pricing engine — operators integrate third-party pricing tools.
- iGMS offers Zapier? No — Tokeet has Zapier connectivity and 17+ native integrations including PriceLabs, Mailchimp, and Slack; iGMS ships with core OTA integrations plus direct-booking tools but no public Zapier app.
- Tokeet is owned by Hostaway giving a natural upgrade path to enterprise-grade tooling. iGMS is independent with no affiliated enterprise tier.
Common objections
- iGMS Flex pay-per-night pricing sounds great for seasonal operators — is it actually cheaper than Tokeet?
- Depends on your booking volume. Flex is $1/booked night with a $20/property minimum. If you average 15 booked nights/property/month, you pay $20/property (the minimum). If you average 25 booked nights, you pay $25/property — already above Tokeet's $14.99. Flex only wins for operators with low occupancy (under ~15 nights/month) or highly seasonal inventory. For steady-occupancy operators, Tokeet's flat fee is cheaper.
- I only list on Airbnb, Vrbo, and Booking.com — why pay for Tokeet's extra channels?
- You're not paying more for them — Tokeet's $14.99/listing is flat regardless of how many channels you use. The value of Tokeet's Expedia, Agoda, and Marriott connections isn't immediate if you're not using those channels, but they're there when you want to test expansion. The real comparison is feature depth: Tokeet's Webready, Rategenie, Automata, and Zapier vs iGMS's messaging automation and cleaning management. If your needs are purely messaging + calendar sync on 3 channels, iGMS Lite at $14/property is competitive; if you want direct booking, dynamic pricing, and Zapier, Tokeet is the better value.
- iGMS is rated for 2–20 listings and Tokeet for 3–50 — does that actually matter below 20?
- Below 10 listings, both work fine and the decision comes down to pricing model preference and feature set. Between 10–20, Tokeet starts showing its edge because it ships more PMS features (Rategenie, Webready) as core — iGMS users often layer PriceLabs and a separate website builder, driving total cost above Tokeet's all-in price. Past 20 listings, Tokeet's upgrade path to Hostaway matters; iGMS enterprise tier exists but lacks the same migration story.
Keep digging
Tokeet
Strong feature-to-price ratio for budget-conscious property managers
iGMS
Solid automation for small portfolios, but outgrown quickly by reporting needs