Skip to main content

Comparison

Beds24 vs Kigo

Pricing, pros and cons, and buyer-fit side-by-side. Pick the one that matches your operation — or see why neither should.

Property Management Software

Beds24

Pay-as-you-use channel manager, PMS, and booking engine

Best Value

Unusually cheap, unusually programmable — if you can stomach the UI

From €15.90/listing • No free trial

Property Management Software

Kigo

All-in-one vacation rental PMS with channel management, now a Guesty company

Solid Option

Comprehensive channel management hampered by per-booking commissions and reliability issues

From $59/mo • Free trial

Visit Beds24 →Visit Kigo →
✓Editorial verdict

Which Should You Pick: Beds24 or Kigo?

Pick Beds24 if you want zero booking commission, transparent €15.90/mo + €0.55/mo per channel link pricing, certified top-tier status across Airbnb, Booking.com, Expedia, AND Vrbo, and an open REST API V2 — without paying commission on direct or cancelled bookings. Pick Kigo if you want a $59/mo flat base with bundled eSignature for rental agreements, a contactless guest portal, automated task scheduling, and a website creator — and you can absorb 1.25–4% per-booking commission including on direct and cancelled bookings.

Editorial perspective from the Beds24 side; factual claims about Kigo are drawn from its review.

Pricing Side-by-Side

From €15.90/listing • No free trial

Per listing

Beds24 prices in EUR on its pricing page with multi-currency billing (USD, AUD, CAD, EUR, GBP, NZD). Base €15.90/mo for a property with one rental; each channel link costs €0.55/mo. No commission on bookings. EU customers without a valid VAT registration and all customers based in Germany pay VAT on top.

Try Beds24

From $59/mo • Free trial

Flat monthly

$59/mo flat rate subscription. Kigo charges 1.25% on non-payment bookings (e.g., Airbnb where the OTA collects payment) and 4% on paid bookings (e.g., VRBO, Booking.com, Direct) — the 4% includes credit card processing fees (~2.8% Stripe), making the effective platform commission ~1.2%. Commission is charged even on cancelled bookings. Free trial available, no credit card required.

Try Kigo

What each tool does well — and where it falls short

What Beds24 does well

  • Pay-as-you-grow per-rental + per-channel-link pricing with no booking commission

    Rather than tiered plans, Beds24 charges only for rentals you run and channels you connect, which makes it cheap to start small and predictable to scale.

  • Top-tier OTA partnership status across the four largest channels

    Beds24 is a Preferred+ Airbnb Software Partner, a Booking.com Premier Partner (10 consecutive years), Expedia Elite Partner for 2025, and Vrbo Preferred Partner for 2026 — certified two-way connectivity means better support paths and faster channel feature rollouts.

  • Open REST API V2 plus JSON booking webhooks for custom automation

    An OpenAPI/Swagger-documented REST API and JSON booking webhooks make Beds24 unusually programmable for a tool in this price range — per the wiki, webhooks can trigger server-side actions to retrieve a new booking via API.

What Kigo does well

  • Extensive channel management and synchronization

    Kigo offers seamless integration to major third-party channels with synchronized availability, rates, and content across multiple listing sites, reducing risk of double bookings and opening up sales revenue opportunities.

  • User-friendly interface for daily operations

    Users with 30+ years in vacation rentals find Kigo the quickest and easiest to learn for getting daily tasks completed, with straightforward processes for payments, refunds, and customer communication.

  • Comprehensive feature coverage in one platform

    Kigo integrates reservation management, distribution, marketing, revenue management, eSignature, and website creation in one platform, streamlining operations for property managers.

Where Beds24 falls short

  • Dated interface and steep learning curve

    Beds24 exposes hundreds of granular settings; Capterra reviewers describe the UI as reminiscent of '97's Windows' and note setup can be clunky and tricky to navigate.

  • Support is primarily email/ticket-based

    Fine for self-sufficient operators, but a friction point during high-pressure incidents like double-bookings or payment failures — Research.com notes live support availability could be better.

  • Third-party payment and app ecosystem lags US-centric incumbents

    Gateway and ops-tool coverage exists but is narrower than Hostaway or Guesty — Research.com notes integration breadth is decent but not as broad as some larger platforms.

Where Kigo falls short

  • High pricing burden on smaller operations

    Pricing is consistently noted as high for smaller businesses, with minimum monthly fees that can be prohibitive for operators with limited vacation rental inventory.

  • Technical complexity and reliability issues

    Users report frequent bugs and glitches affecting integrations, calendar syncing, and website functionality, with an average Ease of Use rating of 3.7 versus the 4.5 category average.

  • Commission charges on all bookings including direct

    Unlike many competitors, Kigo charges a percentage of all bookings including direct bookings not acquired through channels, and continues charging commission even on cancelled bookings.

Which Should You Pick

Pick Beds24 if

Multi-channel hosts and small-to-mid hotels, B&Bs, or vacation-rental managers who want a combined PMS/channel-manager/booking-engine and prefer paying only for rentals and channel connections they actually use.

Skip Beds24 if

You want a polished modern UI with white-glove onboarding and live phone support, or you require a large pre-built US-centric integration ecosystem.

Pick Kigo if

Mid-to-large vacation rental managers seeking comprehensive channel distribution and established integrations

Skip Kigo if

Budget-conscious small operators or those prioritizing cost efficiency over extensive channel connectivity

Where Beds24 and Kigo actually differ

  • Booking commission: Beds24 charges zero commission on any booking. Kigo charges 1.25% on Airbnb (non-payment) and 4% on paid bookings — including direct bookings AND even cancelled bookings (the 4% includes ~2.8% CC processing, net platform fee ~1.2%). At any meaningful booking volume, Kigo's commission dwarfs the base-fee gap.
  • OTA certifications: Beds24 holds Preferred+ Airbnb, Booking.com Premier (10 years), Expedia Elite 2025, and Vrbo Preferred 2026. Kigo holds no documented preferred-partner status on any OTA — Beds24 has priority API access on all four majors that Kigo can't match.
  • Channel breadth: Beds24 references 60+ OTAs with €0.55/mo per channel link. Kigo connects to 5 direct channels (Airbnb, Vrbo, Booking.com, Expedia, TripAdvisor) — Beds24 reaches dramatically further at known per-link cost.
  • Bundled operations tools: Kigo bundles eSignature for rental agreements, a contactless guest portal, automated task scheduling, and a website creator into the $59/mo base. Beds24 ships an open REST API and webhooks but bundles no equivalent eSignature, guest portal, or task scheduler — different philosophies (à la carte channel manager + API vs bundled ops platform).
  • Corporate trajectory: Kigo is now a Guesty subsidiary with uncertain long-term roadmap as Guesty consolidates products. Beds24 is independently operated with a sustained 10-year track record of Premier-tier Booking.com partnership — different risk profiles for multi-year platform commitments.

Common objections

Kigo bundles eSignature, a guest portal, task scheduling, and a website creator that Beds24 doesn't ship. Isn't Kigo more complete out of the box?
On bundled operations tooling, yes — Kigo packs more into the $59/mo base. But Kigo's commission structure typically erases that advantage at any real booking volume. At 20 listings doing $300K/year in paid-channel revenue, Kigo's 4% commission alone runs ~$12,000/year on top of the $708 base. Beds24 at 20 rentals on 3 channels runs ~€78/mo (~$1,000/year) with zero commission — and you can replace Kigo's bundled features with DocuSign, a smart lock, and a separate website for far less than Kigo's commission cost. Bundled convenience versus zero commission and certified OTA depth.
Kigo has a $59/mo flat base while Beds24's per-rental + per-channel-link math is harder to model. Isn't Kigo simpler?
Kigo's base is simpler to quote, but Kigo's real cost depends entirely on booking volume through 1.25–4% commission — math you can't predict without modeling actual bookings. Beds24's per-rental + per-link pricing is fully calculable upfront: 10 rentals × €1 + €15.90 + (10 rentals × 3 channels × €0.55) = €42.40/mo, period. Beds24 is more verbose but more deterministic; Kigo's $59/mo headline hides commission variability.
Kigo charges only 1.25% on Airbnb since Airbnb collects payment — isn't that competitive with Beds24's 'zero commission' claim?
On Airbnb specifically, the 1.25% gap to Beds24's zero is small. The bigger problem is Kigo's 4% on paid bookings (Vrbo, Booking.com, Expedia, direct) and the commission on cancelled bookings — no major competitor matches charging for cancellations. If you're Airbnb-only and rarely take direct bookings, the gap narrows. If you distribute across all four majors and accept direct bookings, Beds24's zero-commission model is structurally cheaper and more predictable.

Keep Digging

Beds24

Unusually cheap, unusually programmable — if you can stomach the UI

Kigo

Comprehensive channel management hampered by per-booking commissions and reliability issues