Skip to main content

Comparison

iGMS vs Track Hospitality

Pricing, pros and cons, and buyer-fit side-by-side. Pick the one that matches your operation — or see why neither should.

Property Management Software

iGMS

Automate 90% of your vacation rental hosting tasks

Best for Small Hosts

Solid automation for small portfolios, but outgrown quickly by reporting needs

From $14/listing • No free trial

Property Management Software

Track Hospitality

Enterprise vacation rental PMS with deep accounting and distribution

Best for Enterprise

Enterprise PMS with best-in-class accounting — if you can stomach the onboarding

From $5,000 • No free trial

Visit iGMS →Visit Track Hospitality →
✓Editorial verdict

Which Should You Pick: iGMS or Track Hospitality?

Pick Track Hospitality if you manage 50+ listings and need enterprise-grade accounting, owner statements, tax reporting, and premium channel distribution including Marriott Homes & Villas — the $5,000/mo minimum only makes economic sense at that scale. Pick iGMS if you run under 30 listings and want affordable per-property pricing starting at $14/mo with solid Airbnb/Vrbo/Booking.com automation and guest messaging.

Editorial perspective from the iGMS side; factual claims about Track Hospitality are drawn from its review.

Pricing Side-by-Side

From $14/listing • No free trial

Lite

$14/property/mo

No stated limit

Booking fee: None stated

  • Multi-channel calendar sync
  • Automated guest messaging
  • Cleaning management
  • Direct booking tools
Try iGMS

Flex

$1/booked night ($20/property minimum)

No stated limit

Booking fee: None stated

  • Everything in Lite
  • Pay-per-use pricing model
Try iGMS

Pro

$18/property/mo

No stated limit

Booking fee: None stated

  • Everything in Lite
  • Advanced features
Try iGMS

Enterprise

Custom

30+ properties

Booking fee: None stated

  • Everything in Pro
  • Custom pricing
Try iGMS

Track Hospitality

Full pricing →

From $5,000 • No free trial

Custom

Starts at $5,000/month per Capterra. Custom pricing based on portfolio size — contact sales for exact quote. Users report auto-renewing contracts and price increases without notice. No free trial available.

Try Track Hospitality

What each tool does well — and where it falls short

What iGMS does well

  • Strong automation that drives real portfolio growth

    Users report iGMS helped them grow by over 50% and add new units with less effort. The platform automates guest messaging, reviews, and cleaning management.

  • Zero commission on direct bookings

    Direct bookings through iGMS eliminate OTA fees of up to 17%, allowing property managers to keep significantly more revenue compared to listing exclusively on platforms like Airbnb or Vrbo.

  • Proven scale across global operations

    iGMS manages almost 90,000 property listings across 49+ countries and processes more than 500,000 reservations monthly, demonstrating reliable multi-channel sync at scale.

What Track Hospitality does well

  • User-friendly interface and cost-effectiveness for large portfolios

    Reviews stated that Track was user-friendly and cost-effective — though 'cost-effective' applies mainly at scale where $5K/mo is spread across many units.

  • Strongest-in-class accounting and tax features

    The accounting & tax side of TRACK is its strongest feature, per GetApp reviews. Critical for operators managing owner statements and tax compliance across many properties.

  • Measurable revenue performance improvement

    On average, customers see a 27% boost in RevPAR according to Track's official website. Likely attributable to distribution breadth and revenue management integrations.

Where iGMS falls short

  • Financial reporting is a weak point

    95% of reviews on financial reporting say the system offers limited report variations and customizations, making it difficult for operators who need detailed revenue analytics.

  • No accounting software integration

    iGMS lacks built-in accounting features and has no QuickBooks integration, forcing property managers to maintain a completely separate accounting workflow.

  • Calendar sync reliability concerns

    Some users report booking synchronization problems that can lead to double bookings across platforms, which is a serious operational risk for multi-channel hosts.

Where Track Hospitality falls short

  • Customer support is unreliable and deteriorating

    There's a revolving door of customer success reps and support has become almost non-existent, with only a 50% chance you'll receive a reply to a ticket. Multiple reviewers corroborate.

  • Aggressive pricing and contract practices

    TRACK raised pricing without customer consent, and when customers tried to cancel, they were told they had to pay for another 12 months due to auto-renewal.

  • Onboarding takes 6+ months with ongoing fees

    The onboarding process is excessively prolonged, lasting over six months, with ongoing fees during the entire period. Budget for a long ramp-up before seeing value.

Which Should You Pick

Pick iGMS if

Small to medium property managers who want to automate 90% of daily hosting tasks across multiple OTAs like Airbnb, Booking.com, and Vrbo from one unified calendar.

Skip iGMS if

Large-scale operations requiring advanced financial reporting, QuickBooks integration, or enterprise-level team management tools.

Pick Track Hospitality if

Large property managers with 50–500+ listings who need institutional-grade accounting, tax reporting, and broad channel distribution — and have budget for $5K+/mo.

Skip Track Hospitality if

You manage fewer than 20 listings, need fast onboarding, or cannot commit to a $5K/mo minimum with auto-renewing annual contracts.

Where iGMS and Track Hospitality actually differ

  • Track starts at $5,000/mo with custom enterprise pricing and auto-renewing contracts; iGMS offers tiered per-property plans starting at $14/property/mo (Lite), $1/booked night with $20 minimum (Flex), or $18/property/mo (Pro) — at 20 listings iGMS runs roughly $280–$360/mo versus Track's $5,000/mo floor.
  • Track provides 75+ integration partners with open API access; iGMS has limited API access, no Zapier support, and focuses on core OTA connections only.
  • Track distributes to 6 direct channels including Marriott Homes & Villas, HomeToGo, and Hopper; iGMS covers Airbnb, Vrbo, and Booking.com — the three highest-volume OTAs but no premium or meta-search channels.
  • Track is built around enterprise accounting, tax compliance, and owner statements for multi-owner portfolios; iGMS focuses on operational automation — unified guest messaging, automated reviews, and task management — without comparable financial reporting depth.
  • iGMS targets 1–5 listing hosts as its sweet spot and rates "skip" for 20+ listings; Track rates "skip" for small and mid-size operators and only starts making sense at 50+ units where per-unit cost drops below $100/mo.

Common objections

Track costs $5,000/mo minimum — why not just use iGMS at $14/property?
If you have under 50 listings, you probably should. iGMS handles core PMS workflows — calendar sync, guest messaging, review management — at a fraction of Track's cost. Track's value is in enterprise accounting, compliance-grade owner statements, and premium channel access that iGMS doesn't attempt. The math only works when per-unit Track costs drop below ~$100/mo and those enterprise features save you more than the price gap.
iGMS covers the three OTAs that drive 90%+ of bookings — do Track's extra channels actually justify the price difference?
For standard urban or suburban STR portfolios, rarely on their own. Airbnb, Vrbo, and Booking.com handle the bulk of demand, and iGMS connects to all three. Track's Marriott Homes & Villas, HomeToGo, and Hopper channels matter most for high-end or resort-style properties where Marriott's loyalty program and meta-search traffic open incremental demand that the big three don't reach.
iGMS manages nearly 90,000 listings globally — doesn't that prove it works at scale?
That aggregate count reflects many small hosts, not large individual portfolios. iGMS's own segment fit rates "skip" for 20+ listings due to gaps in financial reporting, accounting integration, and enterprise team tools. Track is purpose-built for the back-office complexity that emerges at scale — owner statements, tax compliance, multi-channel revenue reconciliation. Platform-wide listing volume doesn't equal enterprise readiness for any single operator.

Keep Digging

iGMS

Solid automation for small portfolios, but outgrown quickly by reporting needs

Track Hospitality

Enterprise PMS with best-in-class accounting — if you can stomach the onboarding