Skip to main content

Comparison

iGMS vs Track Hospitality

Pricing, pros and cons, and buyer-fit side-by-side. Pick the one that matches your operation — or see why neither should.

Property Management

iGMS

Automate 90% of your vacation rental hosting tasks

Best for Small Hosts

Solid automation for small portfolios, but outgrown quickly by reporting needs

From $14/listing • No free trial

Property Management

Track Hospitality

Enterprise vacation rental PMS with deep accounting and distribution

Best for Enterprise

Enterprise PMS with best-in-class accounting — if you can stomach the onboarding

From $5,000 • No free trial

Visit iGMSVisit Track Hospitality
Editorial verdict

Which should you pick: iGMS or Track Hospitality?

Pick track-hs if you manage 50+ listings and need enterprise-grade accounting, tax reporting, owner statements, and premium channel distribution including Marriott Homes & Villas — and you can commit to $5,000/mo with 6+ month onboarding. Pick iGMS if you run 3–30 listings and want per-property pricing (~$14–$16/property/mo) with unified messaging across Airbnb/Vrbo/Booking.com, a free trial, and same-week setup.

Editorial perspective from the Track Hospitality side; factual claims about iGMS are drawn from its review.

Pricing side-by-side

From $14/listing • No free trial

Lite

$14/property/mo

No stated limit

Booking fee: None stated

  • Multi-channel calendar sync
  • Automated guest messaging
  • Cleaning management
  • Direct booking tools

Flex

$1/booked night ($20/property minimum)

No stated limit

Booking fee: None stated

  • Everything in Lite
  • Pay-per-use pricing model

Pro

$18/property/mo

No stated limit

Booking fee: None stated

  • Everything in Lite
  • Advanced features

Enterprise

Custom

30+ properties

Booking fee: None stated

  • Everything in Pro
  • Custom pricing

Track Hospitality

Full pricing →

From $5,000 • No free trial

Custom

Starts at $5,000/month per Capterra. Custom pricing based on portfolio size — contact sales for exact quote. Users report auto-renewing contracts and price increases without notice. No free trial available.

What each tool does well — and where it falls short

What iGMS does well

  • Strong automation that drives real portfolio growth

    Users report iGMS helped them grow by over 50% and add new units with less effort. The platform automates guest messaging, reviews, and cleaning management.

  • Zero commission on direct bookings

    Direct bookings through iGMS eliminate OTA fees of up to 17%, allowing property managers to keep significantly more revenue compared to listing exclusively on platforms like Airbnb or Vrbo.

  • Proven scale across global operations

    iGMS manages almost 90,000 property listings across 49+ countries and processes more than 500,000 reservations monthly, demonstrating reliable multi-channel sync at scale.

What Track Hospitality does well

  • User-friendly interface and cost-effectiveness for large portfolios

    Reviews stated that Track was user-friendly and cost-effective — though 'cost-effective' applies mainly at scale where $5K/mo is spread across many units.

  • Strongest-in-class accounting and tax features

    The accounting & tax side of TRACK is its strongest feature, per GetApp reviews. Critical for operators managing owner statements and tax compliance across many properties.

  • Measurable revenue performance improvement

    On average, customers see a 27% boost in RevPAR according to Track's official website. Likely attributable to distribution breadth and revenue management integrations.

Where iGMS falls short

  • Financial reporting is a weak point

    95% of reviews on financial reporting say the system offers limited report variations and customizations, making it difficult for operators who need detailed revenue analytics.

  • No accounting software integration

    iGMS lacks built-in accounting features and has no QuickBooks integration, forcing property managers to maintain a completely separate accounting workflow.

  • Calendar sync reliability concerns

    Some users report booking synchronization problems that can lead to double bookings across platforms, which is a serious operational risk for multi-channel hosts.

Where Track Hospitality falls short

  • Customer support is unreliable and deteriorating

    There's a revolving door of customer success reps and support has become almost non-existent, with only a 50% chance you'll receive a reply to a ticket. Multiple reviewers corroborate.

  • Aggressive pricing and contract practices

    TRACK raised pricing without customer consent, and when customers tried to cancel, they were told they had to pay for another 12 months due to auto-renewal.

  • Onboarding takes 6+ months with ongoing fees

    The onboarding process is excessively prolonged, lasting over six months, with ongoing fees during the entire period. Budget for a long ramp-up before seeing value.

Which should you pick

Pick iGMS if

Small to medium property managers who want to automate 90% of daily hosting tasks across multiple OTAs like Airbnb, Booking.com, and Vrbo from one unified calendar.

Skip iGMS if

Large-scale operations requiring advanced financial reporting, QuickBooks integration, or enterprise-level team management tools.

Pick Track Hospitality if

Large property managers with 50–500+ listings who need institutional-grade accounting, tax reporting, and broad channel distribution — and have budget for $5K+/mo.

Skip Track Hospitality if

You manage fewer than 20 listings, need fast onboarding, or cannot commit to a $5K/mo minimum with auto-renewing annual contracts.

Where iGMS and Track Hospitality actually differ

  • track-hs starts at $5,000/mo with custom pricing and auto-renewing annual contracts. iGMS uses per-property pricing around $14–$16/property/mo with annual discounts and a free trial. At 15 listings, iGMS runs ~$210–$240/mo versus track-hs's $5,000/mo — roughly 20x cost difference.
  • track-hs's top-cited feature is best-in-class accounting and tax reporting with owner statements for compliance-grade multi-owner financial management. iGMS has basic reporting focused on operational metrics (booking volumes, cleaning schedules) without comparable accounting depth.
  • track-hs connects to 6 direct channels including Marriott Homes & Villas, HomeToGo, and Hopper. iGMS focuses on the big three (Airbnb, Vrbo, Booking.com) — track-hs has premium and regional channel access iGMS lacks.
  • iGMS's strengths are unified messaging across Airbnb/Vrbo/Booking.com, automated review requests, and task management. track-hs has guest communication tools but its emphasis is back-office accounting and distribution — iGMS wins on day-to-day guest communication workflows.
  • track-hs has 6+ month onboarding with ongoing fees during setup and documented support issues (~50% reply rate). iGMS has same-week setup, a free trial, and generally better-reported support — dramatically better small-operator accessibility.

Common objections

iGMS is 20x cheaper at 15 listings — why would anyone pay track-hs's $5,000/mo?
At 15 listings, nothing justifies it. track-hs's economics require 50+ units where per-unit cost drops to ~$100/mo and enterprise accounting solves problems at scale iGMS doesn't attempt. Below 50 listings, iGMS (and most per-listing tools) handle the core PMS workflows at a tiny fraction of the cost. track-hs explicitly isn't priced for growth-stage or small operators.
iGMS has a free trial and same-week setup — at track-hs's price, its 6+ month onboarding looks indefensible. Is it?
The onboarding time partially reflects feature depth: configuring compliance-grade accounting, custom fee structures, owner statements, and multi-channel revenue reconciliation legitimately takes months. But charging ongoing fees during that setup period is the user-hostile part — track-hs charges $30,000+ in subscription fees before you see operational value. iGMS's free trial is structurally more customer-friendly even if its scope is narrower.
iGMS covers the three OTAs most operators actually use — aren't track-hs's extra channels overkill?
For most operators, yes. Airbnb, Vrbo, and Booking.com drive 90%+ of bookings for typical STR portfolios, and iGMS handles them cleanly. track-hs's Marriott Homes & Villas, HomeToGo, and Hopper channels are premium additions that matter mainly for high-end operators who benefit from Marriott's loyalty program distribution or HomeToGo's meta-search traffic. For standard STR operations, the extra channels are marginal value.

Keep digging

iGMS

Solid automation for small portfolios, but outgrown quickly by reporting needs

Track Hospitality

Enterprise PMS with best-in-class accounting — if you can stomach the onboarding